Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tim Hart" <tjhart(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>,<pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)
Date: 2002-06-27 07:30:47
Message-ID: D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015420@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au] 
> Sent: 27 June 2002 08:08
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Tim Hart
> Cc: Andrew Sullivan; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)
> 
> 
> Hmmm...
> 
> I think this is a common fallacy.  It's like arguing that if 
> windoze crashes and you lose important data then you have 
> some sort of legal recourse against Microsoft.  Ever read one 
> of their EULAs?  $10 says that Oracle's license grants them 
> absolute immunity to any kind of damages claim.

I'm inclined to agree, though if it were the case, just buy Red Hat
Database.

Regards, Dave.



pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tim HartDate: 2002-06-27 07:32:53
Subject: Re: Why I like partial solutions
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-06-27 07:08:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2002-06-27 12:28:25
Subject: Re: Postgres idea list
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-06-27 07:08:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group