On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> […] Perhaps we could let people say
> something like WITH x AS FENCE (...) when they want the fencing
> behavior, and otherwise assume they don't (but give it to them anyway
> if there's a data-modifying operation in there).
I would love to be able to test some of our CTE queries in such a scenario.
None of them do data modification. How hard would it be to patch my own
build to disable the fence unilaterally for testing purposes?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2011-11-02 17:13:06|
|Subject: Re: Guide to PG's capabilities for inlining, predicate hoisting, flattening, etc?|
|Previous:||From: David Boreham||Date: 2011-11-02 15:20:45|
|Subject: Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies|