Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Date: 2015-04-25 02:21:37
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRa7UnjGivnP1TuWH+XQBzZgN2VX4Ub2LmSggSMRErQrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Curious about what you think about my proposal to go back to putting
> the inference specification WHERE clause within the parenthesis, since
> this solves several problems, including clarifying to users that the
> predicate is part of the inference clause.

I've *provisionally* pushed code that goes back to the old way,
Andres: https://github.com/petergeoghegan/postgres/commit/2a5d80b27d2c5832ad26dde4651c64dd2004f401

Perhaps this is the least worst way, after all.
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2015-04-25 04:39:04 Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] 4B row limit for CLOB tables
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-04-25 00:59:26 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0