Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch: bytea_agg

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch: bytea_agg
Date: 2012-04-04 23:22:59
Message-ID: CAM-w4HOW4qw_2rMGi7Q63Bdtz+2tDWwO9wEH-gdsnumB2Jkv_Q@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The renaming you propose would only be acceptable to those who have
> forgotten that history.  I haven't.

I had. I looked it up
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-08/msg00044.php

That was quite a thread.

-- 
greg

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-04-04 23:25:46
Subject: Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
Previous:From: Daniel FarinaDate: 2012-04-04 23:09:37
Subject: Re: Faster compression, again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group