Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position
Date: 2015-03-30 19:58:50
Message-ID: CAFj8pRD1f4Eby6X-ruxEM0uCRHCemEzm2Ec6zXZqsqQCbtL=XA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-03-30 21:30 GMT+02:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:

> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2015-03-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> > > In the public docs, you should s/position/subscript because that's the
> > > term used throughout the docs for an index into an array. I still like
> > > the name array_position() for the function though, because it's
> > > consistent with the existing position() functions.
> >
> > updated patch
>
> Thanks, pushed.
>
>
Thank you very much

Pavel

> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-03-30 20:39:34 Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-03-30 19:50:09 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits.