On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Marco Nenciarini
<marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>
> On 30/06/2012 04:16, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I've been reviewing this patch.
> >
> > Good documentation, and regression tests. The code looked fine but I
> > didn't care for the code duplication between array_replace and
> > array_remove so I merged those into a helper function,
> > array_replace_internal(). Thoughts?
>
> It looks reasonable.
>
> There was a typo in array_replace which was caught by regression tests.
> I've fixed the typo and changed a comment in array_replace_internal.
>
> Patch v3 attached.
Looks good to me, marked ready for commiter.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2012-07-01 19:59:08 |
| Subject: Re: XX000: enum value 117721 not found in cache for enum enumcrash |
| Previous: | From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig | Date: 2012-07-01 19:13:26 |
| Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby |