From: | Vishnu VV <movievishnu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org, psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: commercial license availability |
Date: | 2012-09-14 17:55:06 |
Message-ID: | CAEe5fqTRFErAP0ym6KQmCaPeeewTKtj3LCZCpUynZMFqgz2G9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
Hi Danielle,
The concern is with LGPL v3 in a closed appliance in the consumer space;
and that we would have to allow others to patch the product with an updated
version of the library. We have no issue releasing any improvements made
to the driver back to the community, the concern is if we would end up
exposing other commercial code that would be required to patch the driver
in our product.
We have no problem with LGPL v2 or a commercial license that required us to
release back changes we make to the driver itself. Is that a possibility?
If we can call you or your team regarding a commercial license, that should
help us use psycopg and postgresql.
Thanks,
Vishnu
5123786441
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <
daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Vishnu VV <movievishnu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there any commercial license that is sold for psycopg driver. LGPL V3
> > seems very restrictive.
>
> Why it is restrictive? You don't have to open source your product in
> order to just use psycopg2. If you instead improve the driver we want
> your improvements back. Is that restrictive?
>
>
> -- Daniele
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | P. Christeas | 2012-09-15 07:50:02 | Re: commercial license availability |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2012-09-14 17:35:33 | Re: psycopg2 hang with multithread frequent queries |