2013/2/1 Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I noticed the v10 patch cannot be applied on the latest master branch
>> cleanly. The attached ones were rebased.
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm just getting started looking at this, but notice that the second
> patch relies on contrib/postgres_fdw to apply, but it's not clear to
> me where to get the correct version of that.  One way to solve this
> would be to tell me where to get a version of that, and another that
> may work well would be to relay a Git repository with postgres_fdw and
> the writable fdw changes accumulated.
>
> I poked around on git.postgresql.org and github and wasn't able to
> find a recent pushed copy of this.
>
> Anyway, I'm looking at the first patch, which applies neatly. Thanks.
>
Thanks for your reviewing.

The second part assumes the latest (v5) postgres_fdw patch being
applied. It has been in status of ready-for-committer since last CF,
and nothing was changed.
  https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=940

If I oversight nothing, it is the latest version I reviewed before.
Is there somebody who can volunteer to review his patch and commit it?

Hanada-san, if you have some updates, please share it with us.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

• Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables at 2013-02-01 10:22:06 from Daniel Farina

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Pavan Deolasee	Date: 2013-02-01 11:08:43
	Subject: Re: Unusually high IO for autovacuum worker
Previous:	From: Daniel Farina	Date: 2013-02-01 10:22:06
	Subject: Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables