Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Moving core timestamp typedefs/macros somewhere else

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Moving core timestamp typedefs/macros somewhere else
Date: 2011-09-08 00:35:11
Message-ID: CADxJZo2N4eNGx5oydnMUzYac4-FQKUb5oAEvhzTF4CSAfOWzEg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 8 September 2011 10:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If you believe the idea I suggested a few days ago that we ought to try
> to push basic typedefs into a separate set of headers, then this could
> be the first instance of that, which would lead to naming it something
> like "datatype/timestamp.h".  If that seems premature, then I guess it
> ought to go into utils/, but then we need some other name because
> utils/timestamp.h is taken.

The separate headers for basic typedefs makes perfect sense to me.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: davegDate: 2011-09-08 00:55:59
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-09-08 00:22:44
Subject: Moving core timestamp typedefs/macros somewhere else

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group