Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Moving core timestamp typedefs/macros somewhere else
On 8 September 2011 10:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: > If you believe the idea I suggested a few days ago that we ought to try > to push basic typedefs into a separate set of headers, then this could > be the first instance of that, which would lead to naming it something > like "datatype/timestamp.h". If that seems premature, then I guess it > ought to go into utils/, but then we need some other name because > utils/timestamp.h is taken. The separate headers for basic typedefs makes perfect sense to me. Cheers, BJ
In response to
- Moving core timestamp typedefs/macros somewhere else at 2011-09-08 00:22:44 from Tom Lane
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: daveg Date: 2011-09-08 00:55:59 Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held Previous: From: Tom Lane Date: 2011-09-08 00:22:44 Subject: Moving core timestamp typedefs/macros somewhere else