Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hung JDBC connections

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Mike Charnoky <noky(at)nextbus(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung JDBC connections
Date: 2012-06-08 18:18:32
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

The latest version of the driver does have setTimeout implemented.

Curious who's java implementation are you using ?

Dave Cramer


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mike Charnoky <noky(at)nextbus(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Yesterday we experienced a problem whereby hundreds of JDBC client
> connections remained in a hung state, despite the fact that the PostgreSQL
> server was actually rebooted. This is disconcerting because our client
> applications have a db failover facility, but that feature won't work unless
> existing JDBC connections (most of which are pooled) fail in the first
> place. We had to instead manually restart all client applications to
> eliminate all the hung connections.
> Here are the details:
> * server: PostgreSQL v8.3 on CentOS 5.4
> * clients: JDBC v9.0-802.jdbc4, Java 1.6.0_30, on various CentOS 5.x
> releases
> The strange thing is that on the client side, according to "netstat" the TCP
> connections between the JDBC clients and PostgreSQL were still in the
> ESTABLISHED state (even though the server was rebooted). A thread dump of
> the a typical hung client (one performing DB updates) looked like this, it
> was stuck in a socket read. I was further surprised that some test clients
> (which I did not restart yesterday) are STILL in this hung state this
> morning, 18 hours after the incident!
> "DBThrottle-" prio=10 tid=0xad1ff400 nid=0x24b8 runnable [0xad2ad000]
>   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
>        at Method)
>        at
>        at
> org.postgresql.core.VisibleBufferedInputStream.readMore(
>        at
> org.postgresql.core.VisibleBufferedInputStream.ensureBytes(
>        at
>        at org.postgresql.core.PGStream.ReceiveChar(
>        at
> org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.processResults(
>        at
> org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.execute(
>        - locked <0xb243db20> (a org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl)
>        at
> org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeBatch(
>        at xxx.xxxxxxx.util.DBThrottle.sqlLoop(
>        at xxx.xxxxxxx.util.DBThrottle.access$000(
>        at xxx.xxxxxxx.util.DBThrottle$
> Is there a way this hang can be addressed by the JDBC driver? Again, this is
> very disconcerting that the clients did not detect the server failure. Does
> the connection use any sort of timeout mechanism? Thank you for your help.
> Mike
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Mike CharnokyDate: 2012-06-08 18:57:19
Subject: Re: Hung JDBC connections
Previous:From: Maciek SakrejdaDate: 2012-06-08 16:52:48
Subject: Re: get/setReadOnly broken if default_transaction_read_only on

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group