> > 8.4 had this change:
> > *
> > Force child tables to inherit CHECK constraints from parents
> > (Alex Hunsaker, Nikhil Sontakke, Tom)
> > You're not the only one who occasionally bangs his head against it.
Sorry for the occasional head bumps :)
> Yeah. I think it's good that there's a barrier to blindly dropping a
> constraint that may be important to have on children, but there should
> be a way to override that.
Hmmm, but then it does open up the possibility of naive users shooting
themselves in the foot. It can be easy to conjure up a
parent-only-constraint that does not gel too well with its children. And
that's precisely why this feature was added in the first place..
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Aron||Date: 2011-07-26 08:18:55|
|Subject: Re: vacuumlo patch|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2011-07-26 07:58:42|
|Subject: Re: How to use CreateFunctionStmt's RETURN TABLE?|