On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar may 01 15:30:25 -0400 2012:
>>> Instead, I thought this could easily be fixed by writing this:
>>> %_srv.o: %.c %.o
>>> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(subst -DFRONTEND,, $(CPPFLAGS)) -c $< -o $@
>>> A bit hacky, but should get quite robust results.
>> So basically to build the _srv.o file you first need to build the .o?
>> Since both files need to be built anyway, I don't think this is a
> Are there, or might there be in the future, any "port" files that only
> exist in server flavor and not client-side flavor? It doesn't seem
> terribly unlikely to me. This is a cute hack but it assumes that
> everything in that directory can and should be built both ways.
Isn't that what backend/port/* is for?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2012-05-01 20:54:56|
|Subject: Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json()
function instead of two separate versions ?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-05-01 20:43:23|
|Subject: Re: port _srv.o makefile rules don't observe dependency tracking |