| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "unexpected EOF" messages |
| Date: | 2012-05-03 12:36:56 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExLTsvB2M1JEK2DBM0a4LQ4GH-CgCb2j4CwXUThEV-qtQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > Would we consider adding such a switch (it should be easy enough to
>> > do), or do we want to push this off to the mythical "let's improve the
>> > logging subsystem" project that might eventually materialize if we're
>> > lucky? Meaning - would people object to such a switch?
>>
>> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
>> user-specified message types.
>
>
> Are you answering the "Would we consider" or the "would people object"?
Oh, nice catch - I guess my phrasing of those two questions was really stupid :)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-05-03 12:46:57 | Re: "unexpected EOF" messages |
| Previous Message | Vik Reykja | 2012-05-03 12:34:01 | Re: "unexpected EOF" messages |