Not anymore than that it's yet another sign that pgfoundry has a
horrible availability record. It's been going up and down like this
for years, so I'd expect it to come back in a while.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 07:15, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Is this related to that pgfoundry.org is down at present?
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>> I've just been informed by the Alvaro that the sysadmin team would like
>> to kill off pgFoundry. I don't blame them.
>> However, when we previously had this discussion, there were a list of
>> things to be done in the months leading up to killing off pgFoundry. As
>> far as I know, none of those things were actually done.
>> So, where are we?
>> Josh Berkus
>> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
>> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: baxterstockman||Date: 2012-01-13 15:39:18|
|Subject: BUG #6398: Your projects.postgresql.org site is down|
|Previous:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2012-01-13 06:15:02|
|Subject: Re: Fate of pgFoundry|