Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > >> I'm going to run some more tests, but my thought is that we should >> probably leave the recentglobalxmin changes out for the time being, >> pending further study and consideration of other alternatives. > > Agreed > +1. These are independent patches and should be pursued like that. BTW, I reviewed the pgxact-v2.patch and I have no objections to that and it looks good to go in. Thanks Robert for making the necessary changes and also running the benchmark tests. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
- Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band at 2011-11-24 13:54:31 from Simon Riggs
Responses
- Re: Storing hot members of PGPROC out of the band at 2011-11-25 13:19:08 from Robert Haas
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Pavel Stehule Date: 2011-11-25 06:14:56 Subject: Re: proposal: use errcontext for custom exception too Previous: From: Peter Eisentraut Date: 2011-11-25 04:52:45 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays