Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch: incorrect array offset in backend replication tar header

From: Brian Weaver <cmdrclueless(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch: incorrect array offset in backend replication tar header
Date: 2012-09-25 15:08:07
Message-ID: CAAhXZGtp_OpESYdo1OcXUDXrAU-LhzvHROg_C+dJOZyVwsPQmw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Unless I misread the code, the tar format and streaming xlog are
mutually exclusive. Considering my normal state of fatigue it's not
unlikely. I don't want to have to set my wal_keep_segments
artificially high just for the backup

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
> On 9/25/12 3:38 PM, Brian Weaver wrote:
>>
>> I want
>> to modify pg_basebackup to include the WAL files in the tar output.
>
>
> Doesn't pg_basebackup -x do exactly that?
>
>
> Regards,
> Marko Tiikkaja
>



-- 

/* insert witty comment here */


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brian WeaverDate: 2012-09-25 15:10:59
Subject: Re: Patch: incorrect array offset in backend replication tar header
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2012-09-25 14:38:01
Subject: Re: Oid registry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group