On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> + /* Deleter committed, so tuple is alive if the XID is old enough. */
>>> + return TransactionIdPrecedes(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmax(tuple), OldestXmin);
>> s/alive/dead/ in that comment?
> Yep, good catch, thanks.
>> Otherwise this seems like a good idea.
> Do you think I should apply this to 9.2, or wait until 9.3?
Now please. Well done.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-05-02 16:19:04|
|Subject: Re: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-05-02 16:15:38|
|Subject: Re: Temporary tables under hot standby|