On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Please can we either make it user configurable?
> Weren't you just complaining that *I* was overcomplicating things?
> I see no evidence to justify inventing a user-visible GUC here.
> We have rough consensus on both the need for and the shape of a formula,
> with just minor discussion about the exact parameters to plug into it.
> Punting the problem off to a GUC is not a better answer.
As long as we get 32 buffers on big systems, I have no complaint.
I'm sorry if I moaned at you personally.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-01-06 17:10:09|
|Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-01-06 16:37:25|
|Subject: Re: Poorly thought out code in vacuum|