On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Uhm, we don't have & need palloc support and I don't think
> relpathbackend() is a good justification for adding it.
FWIW, I'm with Tom on this one. Any meaningful code sharing is going
to need that, so we might as well bite the bullet.
And functions that return static buffers are evil incarnate. I've
spent way too much of my life dealing with the supreme idiocy that is
fmtId(). If someone ever finds a way to make that go away, I will buy
them a beverage of their choice at the next conference we're both at.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2013-01-08 22:30:35|
|Subject: Re: Weird Assert failure in GetLockStatusData()|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2013-01-08 22:23:36|
|Subject: Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf