Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date: 2011-08-04 12:57:23
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoba-ZN2SQuWV8sy3_tYzKsUio=94+EufSnamj45DunJ8A@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
>> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
>>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
>> I believe I already did.  See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
>
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

Oh, I see.  Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
in.  The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me
either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2011-08-04 13:07:37
Subject: plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https
Previous:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2011-08-04 12:44:35
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group