On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
>> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>:
>>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
>> I believe I already did. See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.
Oh, I see. Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
in. The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2011-08-04 13:07:37|
|Subject: plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https|
|Previous:||From: Boszormenyi Zoltan||Date: 2011-08-04 12:44:35|
|Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false|