On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Any particular reason? It goes pretty tightly together with
> pg_receivexlog, which is why I'd prefer putting it alongside that one.
> But if you have a good argument against it, I can change my mind :)
Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a
better way to do this in the future.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2013-01-03 17:47:40|
|Subject: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum
stress-testing our system|
|Previous:||From: Charles Gomes||Date: 2013-01-03 17:28:53|
|Subject: Re: Writing Trigger Functions in C|