Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?
Date: 2013-01-03 17:30:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmobOfoDYhRvvTL5_2FnftauJo6tbC7dV_JwqiJyc2Vg8fw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Any particular reason? It goes pretty tightly together with
> pg_receivexlog, which is why I'd prefer putting it alongside that one.
> But if you have a good argument against it, I can change my mind :)

Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a
better way to do this in the future.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2013-01-03 17:47:40
Subject: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system
Previous:From: Charles GomesDate: 2013-01-03 17:28:53
Subject: Re: Writing Trigger Functions in C

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group