Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Date: 2011-08-26 18:36:36
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob+ZRqk7-m2TK1gsQT=kDiJZAnGf+C6-YTz97NiTQqQMQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't have anything in principle against your '--sections="foo bar"'
> suggestion, but it would be more work to program. Simpler, and probably more
> consistent with how we do other things, would be allowing multiple --section
> options, if we don't want to have named options such as I have provided.

I wouldn't object to that, but "more work to program" probably means
about an extra 10 lines of code in this particular case.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-08-26 20:03:41
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Previous:From: Tomas VondraDate: 2011-08-26 18:07:10
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group