Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Date: 2011-08-26 18:36:36
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't have anything in principle against your '--sections="foo bar"'
> suggestion, but it would be more work to program. Simpler, and probably more
> consistent with how we do other things, would be allowing multiple --section
> options, if we don't want to have named options such as I have provided.

I wouldn't object to that, but "more work to program" probably means
about an extra 10 lines of code in this particular case.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-08-26 20:03:41
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Previous:From: Tomas VondraDate: 2011-08-26 18:07:10
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group