On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't have anything in principle against your '--sections="foo bar"'
> suggestion, but it would be more work to program. Simpler, and probably more
> consistent with how we do other things, would be allowing multiple --section
> options, if we don't want to have named options such as I have provided.
I wouldn't object to that, but "more work to program" probably means
about an extra 10 lines of code in this particular case.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-08-26 20:03:41|
|Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only|
|Previous:||From: Tomas Vondra||Date: 2011-08-26 18:07:10|
|Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress|