Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [sepgsql 1/3] add name qualified creation label
Date: 2013-03-27 12:41:18
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa86nAp71BEaunE8gqnyGc3YPbvRdNKRNA9QkkBwd435Q@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> I asked folks of Debian-JP how and when does package maintainer
> pushes new versions. Usually, new versions shall be pushed to
> unstable branch, then testing and stable. But it is now feature freeze
> period thus it is prohibited to push new features to unstable.
> Thus, newer libselinux (2.1.12) is now in experimental branch, but not
> in unstable branch.
> He also said, the newer libselinux will likely moved to unstable when
> feature freeze is unlocked soon. The pgsql-v9.3 shall be released
> several months later, so it also shall be pushed to unstable branch
> several months later at least. It does not make problems.
>
> Due to same reason, RHEL7 does not make a problem even if it
> ships with pgsql-9.3, because the latest libselinux already support
> 2.1.10 feature. Thus, required libselinux version should be sufficient
> when pgsql-9.3 become available on Fedora.

Based on KaiGai's analysis, it seems to me that there is no serious
problem here in terms of versioning, and as this patch represents a
small but useful step forward in our support for SELinux integration,
I'd like to go ahead and push it.

Are there serious objections to that course of action?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2013-03-27 12:44:31
Subject: Re: pgsql: sepgsql: Support for new post-ALTER access hook.
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2013-03-27 12:34:38
Subject: Re: [v9.3] OAT_POST_ALTER object access hooks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group