On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
> It does, but AFAIK the "-l" means logging. I suppose
> "--aggregate-interval" would be a good option name, I don't see a reason
> to put there the additional word when there are other aggregated values
> (e.g. num of transactions).
Oh, I was thinking that the l was for latency, but maybe not.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2012-08-31 22:12:34|
|Subject: Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-08-31 21:17:29|
|Subject: Re: fairly useless psql compatibility warning?|