Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PATCH: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Date: 2012-08-31 21:18:36
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa0rSsu5RxnxXJwXd_6DvLgc2qTXJZPrBCMy06JFZb1ig@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
> It does, but AFAIK the "-l" means logging. I suppose
> "--aggregate-interval" would be a good option name, I don't see a reason
> to put there the additional word when there are other aggregated values
> (e.g. num of transactions).

Oh, I was thinking that the l was for latency, but maybe not.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2012-08-31 22:12:34
Subject: Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-08-31 21:17:29
Subject: Re: fairly useless psql compatibility warning?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group