On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom's point example does not seem to be problematic to me - the cast
> *should* blame the 42 const token, as the cast doesn't work as a
> result of its representation, which is in point of fact why the core
> system blames the Const node and not the coercion one.
I think I agree Tom's position upthread: blaming the coercion seems to
me to make more sense. But if that's what we're trying to do, then
why does parse_coerce() say this?
* Set up to point at the constant's text if the input routine throws
* an error.
/me is confused.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-02-27 05:13:15|
|Subject: Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-02-27 03:44:32|
|Subject: Re: pgstat documentation tables|