Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-07-03 02:52:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ+197rz4C8g_pv_gZB3zyJq2EpXQkRLb=UGzyp3jBevw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> My idea of "not dedicated" is "I can launch a dozen postmasters on this
>> machine, and other services too, and it'll be okay as long as they're
>> not doing too much".
>
> Oh, 128MB then?

Proposed patch attached.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment: initdb-128MB.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (423 bytes)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-03 02:53:15
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-07-03 02:51:41
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group