Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Updating the postgresql.org monitoring server

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: sysadmins(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updating the postgresql.org monitoring server
Date: 2012-03-29 09:57:28
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxT4tujZfWOrbR6AB8GrrOEbNSWjt_iDF4kqWcvHOSDgA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Migration complete! Everything looks OK from here.

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> WHERE "timezone" = 'BST'
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> So lore.postgresql.org was migrated successfully and is now running on
>> the new ESXi host. dominion.postgresql.org failed however, due to what
>> appears to be an incompatibility in the virtual disk formats. We're going
>> to try again tomorrow, this time probably using VMware vCenter Convertor
>> Standalone instead of a simple file transfer. The fun will begin at 9AM.
>>
>> For now, the old server is up and running again.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, this work has been delayed until Wednesday starting 9AM UK time.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 17:14, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> > We're refreshing the hardware on which the Nagios, Munin and
>>>> > automirror services run. As this box is a VMware virtual machine,
>>>> > there will be downtime whilst it's moved to the new host. I'm working
>>>> > with the hosting provider to plan this, but it'll probably be done on
>>>> > Monday.
>>>>
>>>> When it's brought back, please do a check to see that it doesn't end
>>>> up spewing out hundreds of monitoring messages as it comes up, in case
>>>> it was running for a while without proper access to the network..
>>>> That's quite annoying, and I've seen it happen in other such
>>>> migrations...
>>>>
>>>> Other than that, +1 :-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>  Magnus Hagander
>>>>  Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>>>>  Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>


-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Vivek Singh RaghuwanshiDate: 2012-03-29 10:29:21
Subject: Re: Updating the postgresql.org monitoring server
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2012-03-28 14:26:26
Subject: Sneaky unregistered posts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group