Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: dell versus hp

From: Tore Halset <halset(at)pvv(dot)ntnu(dot)no>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Date: 2007-11-06 14:14:19
Message-ID: C556D8F1-326A-4CAD-9ECA-20006D0C6C05@pvv.ntnu.no (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:53 , Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Le mardi 06 novembre 2007, Tore Halset a écrit :
>> 1) Dell 2900 (5U)
>> 8 * 146 GB SAS 15Krpm 3,5"
>> 8GB ram
>> Perc 5/i. battery backup. 256MB ram.
>> 2 * 4 Xeon 2,66GHz
>
> In fact you can add 2 hot-plug disks on this setup, connected to the
> frontpane. We've bought this very same model with 10 15 rpm disks  
> some weeks
> ago, and it reached production last week.
>
> So we have 2 OS raid1 disk (with /var/backups and /var/log ---  
> pg_log), 2
> raid1 disk for WAL and 6 disks in a RAID10, the 3 raids managed by the
> included Perc raid controller. So far so good!

Interesting. Do you have any benchmarking numbers? Did you test with  
software raid 10 as well?

Regards,
  - Tore.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tore HalsetDate: 2007-11-06 14:15:39
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2007-11-06 13:48:31
Subject: Re: dell versus hp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group