Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

From: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date: 2011-06-24 12:32:03
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP695129D4A93A996B7621B28E520@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11-06-24 12:41 AM, Jun Ishiduka wrote:
>
> The logic that not use pg_stop_backup() would be difficult,
> because pg_stop_backup() is used to identify minRecoveryPoint.
>

Considering everything that has been discussed on this thread so far.

Do you still think your patch is the best way to accomplish base backups
from standby servers?
If not what changes do you think should be made?

Steve

> --------------------------------------------
> Jun Ishizuka
> NTT Software Corporation
> TEL:045-317-7018
> E-Mail: ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru Hanada 2011-06-24 12:53:51 Re: debugging tools inside postgres
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-06-24 12:08:28 Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix