Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?

From: Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>
To: Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Date: 2011-10-30 12:13:01
Message-ID: BC19EF15D84DC143A22D6A8F2590F0A788641330BF@EXMAIL.stakes.fi (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sorry, I forgot to include the version used & some information about my setup:
PostgreSQL version: Git HEAD as of:
Date:   Fri Oct 28 21:18:36 2011 -0400
Commit: 51eba98cf4595e90730dedd9305da8aa84b649ee

Compiled with defaults, (only change --with-pgport = 5431). I used default
settings, shared_buffers size is 24MB. The system is Linux Mint Debian edition
(kernel 3.0.0, gcc 4.6.1). The interesting parts about my hardware were in the
original post.

 - Anssi


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2011-10-30 14:27:08
Subject: Re: Add socket dir to pg_config..?
Previous:From: Kääriäinen AnssiDate: 2011-10-30 12:02:41
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group