Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?

From: Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>
To: Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Date: 2011-10-30 12:13:01
Message-ID: BC19EF15D84DC143A22D6A8F2590F0A788641330BF@EXMAIL.stakes.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sorry, I forgot to include the version used & some information about my setup:
PostgreSQL version: Git HEAD as of:
Date: Fri Oct 28 21:18:36 2011 -0400
Commit: 51eba98cf4595e90730dedd9305da8aa84b649ee

Compiled with defaults, (only change --with-pgport = 5431). I used default
settings, shared_buffers size is 24MB. The system is Linux Mint Debian edition
(kernel 3.0.0, gcc 4.6.1). The interesting parts about my hardware were in the
original post.

- Anssi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2011-10-30 14:27:08 Re: Add socket dir to pg_config..?
Previous Message Kääriäinen Anssi 2011-10-30 12:02:41 Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?