On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> We had 1.2 support. To have 2.0, we would have to get rid of the
>>> sl_trigger checks. Or was it dropped along the way of 2.0?
>> No idea - I just recall Sachin working on compatibility, and that was
>> one of/the patch he came of with.
> Yeah, you're right. I now see the commit. Which means we have two bugs
> on 2.0 support.
What happened with this in the end? I've just run into the pg_listener
bug again. I see from the thread you said you were going to work on
it, but then we got side-tracked into a discussion on whether we
should have slony support at all.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgadmin-support by date
|Next:||From: Bob McConnell||Date: 2011-06-01 12:55:38|
|Subject: Re: Pgadmin III loses connection with remote database and then hangs for a long time.|
|Previous:||From: Tim Uckun||Date: 2011-05-31 21:28:31|
|Subject: Re: Pgadmin III loses connection with remote
database and then hangs for a long time.|