Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: oom_killer

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oom_killer
Date: 2011-04-21 16:37:39
Message-ID: BANLkTimhvLXisf5Wz-4g+9VmhBfgq+yG4w@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Tory M Blue <tmblue(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> While I don't mind the occasional slap of reality. This configuration
> has run for 4+ years. It's possible that as many other components each
> fedora release is worse then the priors.

I'd say you've been lucky.
You must be running overnight report queries that didn't run before,
and that require more sorting memory than usual. Or... I dunno... but
something did change.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-04-21 17:36:04
Subject: Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
Previous:From: Tory M BlueDate: 2011-04-21 16:15:51
Subject: Re: oom_killer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group