On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > Project name
>> > Fast GiST index build
>> Would/could/should this be implemented in a manner similar to the
>> existing "GIN fast update" feature?
> I've mentioned this problem in item #2 in project details. In short. Problem
> is in concurrent selects. Buffers size is significant and their scan in
> concurrent select can cause significant slow down. Probably, compromise can
> be achived by using for smaller buffers or something like this, but it's
> topic of separate research. It doesn't seems to be feasible for me to give a
> production solution of this problem during GSoC.
OK. Could you briefly describe the algorithm you propose to
implement, bearing in mind that I haven't read the paper?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-04-04 17:01:38|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: q-gram GIN and GiST indexes|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-04-04 16:47:18|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Support comments on FOREIGN
DATA WRAPPER and SERVER objects.|