Re: patches that could use additional reviewers

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patches that could use additional reviewers
Date: 2011-02-09 19:32:07
Message-ID: B5F34A8BF99F045E14040D3E@amenophis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 9. Februar 2011 13:45:11 -0500 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or
> Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that
> could use more eyes:

I'd happily jump in and look into one of those, but before mid of next week
i really have no spare time to come up with something :(

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-09 19:34:16 Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2011-02-09 19:28:21 Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]