Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CVS in docs

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Date: 2010-09-22 18:42:18
Message-ID: AANLkTinqVbEuzBPj_EEtPp3n7Zzj_2+wrzeBus_UPUgG@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Uh, why only back to 8.2?
>
>> Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now anyway"...
>
> Yeah, but they will each have a final release.  Don't we want to have
> the updated info in the final releases?  I don't care about the
> incidental CVS mentions, but replacing cvs.sgml with that new chapter
> seems worth the trouble.

Hmm. yeah. I'll look at doing it back to 7.4 then. I'll do the
incidental mentions as well if they merge cleanly :-)


>> BTW, there are a ton of conflicts backpatching each step.
>
> Welcome to the fun of back-patching.  Did you get any leverage from

Oh, it's not the first time. I just wanted to make note that one, but
only one, conflicted on the $PostgreSQL$ tag.

> cherry-picking, or did it seem to be just as stupid as plain "patch"?

It *seemed* smarter. But I didn't try to backpatchthe same thing both
ways, so it's hard to tell for sure.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Josh KupershmidtDate: 2010-09-22 19:41:55
Subject: Capitalization of "PL/pgSQL"
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-22 18:37:07
Subject: Re: CVS in docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group