On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> I don't think it's a big cost once all the processes
> have been forked if you're reusing them beyond perhaps slightly more
> efficient cache usage.
Hm, this site claims to get a 13% win just from the reduced tlb misses
using a preload hack with Pg 8.2. That would be pretty substantial.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-10-20 19:30:01|
|Subject: Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin?|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-10-20 19:17:27|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage|