Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement

From: satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement
Date: 2010-06-19 01:01:05
Message-ID: AANLkTinex1lEA0rXBAhCjEjQBlvhYp5zln_9J58CZyyz@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-interfaces
Heikki,

Thanks for the comments.

On 6/19/2010 0:56 Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> A reference of all the directives seems useful, but it seems at least
> partially redundant with what's there already. WHENEVER for example is
> quite well documented at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/ecpg-errors.html already.

Yes. One of the things what I'm afraid is that point.
How could we (re-)organize the document structure to eliminate such redundancy?
Is this necessary?

Any suggestions?
-- 
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi(dot)nagayasu(at)gmail(dot)com>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-06-22 03:42:03
Subject: hot standby documentation
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-06-18 15:56:37
Subject: Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Murray CummingDate: 2010-06-19 23:54:14
Subject: Initial database size on disk
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-06-18 15:56:37
Subject: Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group