Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item
Date: 2010-08-25 08:14:54
Message-ID: AANLkTincUMfs_NJVjH4q=55mLBWu3oveqwMSQbfz4aTB@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need,
> and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the
> main docs.  Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've
> collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1,
> THEN we put it in the main docs.
>
> We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup
> which isn't 100% tested.

The procedure has been since 8.2. We should remove it from the documents
since 8.2?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-08-25 08:18:01
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-08-25 07:58:25
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group