On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> concat() is not a variadic text function. it is variadic "any" that
>> happens to do text coercion (not casting) inside the function. The
>> the assumption that concat is casting internally is probably wrong.
>> Suppose I had hacked the int->text cast to call a custom function -- I
>> would very much expect concat() not to produce output from that
>> function, just the vanilla output text (I could always force the cast
>> if I wanted to).
>> concat is just a function that does something highly similar to
>> casting. suppose I had a function count_memory(variadic "any") that
>> summed memory usage of input args -- forcing casts would make no sense
>> in that context (I'm not suggesting that you think so -- just bringing
>> up a case that illustrates how forcing cast into the function can
>> change behavior in subtle ways).
> Right, but I already said I wasn't objecting to the use of variadic
> ANY in cases like that - only in cases where, as here, you were
> basically taking any old arguments and forcing them all to text.
I believe that another unpleasant side effect of this is that CONCAT()
will have to be declared stable rather than immutable.
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-07-29 21:03:43|
|Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-29 20:51:22|
|Subject: Re: merge command - GSoC progress|