Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: MySQL HandlerSocket - Is this possible in PG?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Ben-Nes <michael(at)epoch(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL HandlerSocket - Is this possible in PG?
Date: 2010-12-22 08:52:28
Message-ID: AANLkTimLkFDC5wDy9HG1_0kF7aiA4ukwtCpcB9EeNpwk@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Michael Ben-Nes <michael(at)epoch(dot)co(dot)il> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just stumbled on the following post:
> http://yoshinorimatsunobu.blogspot.com/2010/10/using-mysql-as-nosql-story-for.html
>
> The post claim that MySQL can do more qps then MemCahed or any other NoSQL
> when doing simple queries like: SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=num;

No it does not.  They use an interface that bypasses SQL and is much
more primitive.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: pasman pasmaƄskiDate: 2010-12-22 09:22:00
Subject: Re: Query uses incorrect index
Previous:From: Pierre CDate: 2010-12-22 08:22:17
Subject: Re: MySQL HandlerSocket - Is this possible in PG?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group