On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 14 September 2010 17:16, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I think a consensus needs to be reached on what you guys want
>>>> changing. Implementing changes isn't a problem, it's what changes
>>>> should be implemented. Whatever is decided, it needs to be easy to
>>>> visually scan the page and its sections, clean and consistent.
>>> It seems like you're giving up just when we've just about got
>>> consensus. Please don't.
>> No, not at all. :) I'm just suggesting that rather than people
>> making a suggestion, and me going ahead and putting that change in
>> straight away (like I have been doing), it should have the support of
>> more than a single person first, otherwise there'll be lots of
>> tweaking and un-tweaking without any real agreement.
>> If you wish to go ahead with what we've currently got, I'll create
>> another patch for Magnus to stage, otherwise what requires changing
>> needs to be decided.
> Oh, OK. Well, +1 for pushing live what's currently at:
> It's probably not perfect, but I think it's better than what we have
> now, and that's sufficient. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.
Thanks, Thom, for putting the time and energy into this. It's lovely to see.
I've been following along, and I think what we have now is a very nice
improvement. Once it is pushed live, I recommend publishing a blog
post and soliciting feedback about the changes. Not necessarily to
change anything right away, but just to collect feedback.
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: no-reply||Date: 2010-09-14 21:01:36|
|Subject: Email attachment rejected|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-14 16:48:14|
|Subject: Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Mike Ellsworth||Date: 2010-09-15 20:15:58|
|Subject: Beta page (pdfs)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-14 17:28:08|
|Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |