Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres References

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sean Crowley <sean(dot)crowley(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Ken(dot)Rosensteel" <Ken(dot)Rosensteel(at)bull(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres References
Date: 2010-11-08 19:15:05
Message-ID: AANLkTim36tZKnOOLuM+YYMb+SJRzf99aoxBKdfqfO+ZP@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Sean Crowley
<sean(dot)crowley(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> NTT may not be on that list because they are an EnterpriseDB customer and
> they are using Postgres Plus Advanced Server not the community PostgreSQL.

That makes sense.  But should Yahoo be even be listed then, since
their fork of Postgresql is even more drastic than EnterpriseDB's?
Also,  NTT seems to be heavily invested in the community version since
they're participating in the development of some of its nicer
features.


-- 
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-11-08 19:41:03
Subject: Re: Postgres References
Previous:From: Sean CrowleyDate: 2010-11-08 19:14:45
Subject: Re: Postgres References

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group