Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Should we release 1.10.3?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should we release 1.10.3?
Date: 2010-05-11 12:35:58
Message-ID: AANLkTilDsp0FtYpn9px2-hGSCESBe_ut2_fAJi7Fvzp2@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 11/05/2010 14:07, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> There will be new PostgreSQL minor releases. There are already 26 bugs
>>>> fixed in 1.10.2+. I wonder if we should also release 1.10.3. Any
>>>> opinions on that? it's probably too much work before pgCon, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> It would be good to wrap it so it could be included in the new
>>> PostgreSQL releases, agreed. I'll leave it to Dave and you to declare
>>> if it's too much work or not, since I'm happily uninvolved in that :D
>>
>> Meh. I'll try to do it Thursday.
>>
>
> I should be available if you need help.

Thanks.

Ashesh; do you have any patches for 1.10.3 that you're working on?

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Ashesh VashiDate: 2010-05-11 14:00:52
Subject: Re: Should we release 1.10.3?
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-05-11 12:33:51
Subject: Re: Should we release 1.10.3?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group