Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: recovery.conf location

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery.conf location
Date: 2010-09-29 07:14:45
Message-ID: AANLkTikcNKModRYWm_4xD8THQvBthzDH152=VxMXF=9K@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The idea of relying on the existence of recovery.conf to determine
> whether we should continue recovery forever or switch to normal
> running seems somewhat klunky to me.  It mixes up settings with
> control information.  Maybe the control information should move to
> pg_control, and the settings to postgresql.conf.  *waves hands*

You mean to move standby_mode to postgresql.conf, and determine
whether the server should start in standby mode or not by considering
of standby_mode and the status information in pg_control?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Leonardo FrancalanciDate: 2010-09-29 07:17:07
Subject: Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-09-29 06:53:39
Subject: Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group