On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I vote for % .
>> I'd vote for %>, out of those. Reason: the operator isn't commutative,
>> in fact left and right inputs aren't even the same datatype, so a glyph
>> that looks asymmetric seems more natural.
> Lots of operators aren't commutative. Arithmetic % for example ;-)
I've committed this as % -- if anyone cares about it enough to keep
arguing, we can change it again.
> I think this bikeshed is going to be more paint than shed.
You said it.
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Daniel Ng||Date: 2010-06-18 06:54:24|
|Subject: Re: to enable O_DIRECT within postgresql|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-06-18 03:09:02|
|Subject: Re: modular se-pgsql as proof-of-concept|