On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 17:39, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 16:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> ... The docs need
>>> to state the truth, namely that "ident" is still allowed as a synonym
>>> for "peer" on local connections. Otherwise people will get confused
>>> as to why their pg_hba files still work.
>> Hmm: Good point, update attached.
> That looks OK to me.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Selena Deckelmann||Date: 2011-03-19 19:05:40|
|Subject: Accepted into GSoC 2011, student proposals start March 28|
|Previous:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2011-03-19 17:13:42|
|Subject: Re: tolower() identifier downcasing versus multibyte encodings|