Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Given that 9.0.1 is out ...

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Given that 9.0.1 is out ...
Date: 2010-10-21 08:05:23
Message-ID: AANLkTikGU3xLgWiKh4ZccKAGNKu7zh2wdOKkmOr2HtFv@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >> ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now?
>> >
>> > Seems this is still not done:
>> >
>> >        v9.0beta1
>> >        v9.0beta2
>> >        v9.0beta3
>> >        v9.0beta4
>> >        v9.0rc1
>> >        v9.1alpha1
>>
>> Well, remove 9.1alpha1 wouldn't be a good idea.  We could possibly
>> remove the others, but I'm not sure we have any consensus that this is
>> the right thing to do.
>
> Could me as a +1 to only have stable releases. Anyone who wants and
> unstable release can pull from git.

I assume you're not really saying that we shouldn't offer alpha
downloads, or snapshot tarballs?


-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-10-21 09:24:21
Subject: Re: New books on PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2010-10-21 04:45:08
Subject: Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group