On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >> ... can we remove the 9.0beta and RC directories from FTP now?
>> > Seems this is still not done:
>> > v9.0beta1
>> > v9.0beta2
>> > v9.0beta3
>> > v9.0beta4
>> > v9.0rc1
>> > v9.1alpha1
>> Well, remove 9.1alpha1 wouldn't be a good idea. We could possibly
>> remove the others, but I'm not sure we have any consensus that this is
>> the right thing to do.
> Could me as a +1 to only have stable releases. Anyone who wants and
> unstable release can pull from git.
I assume you're not really saying that we shouldn't offer alpha
downloads, or snapshot tarballs?
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-10-21 09:24:21|
|Subject: Re: New books on PostgreSQL|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2010-10-21 04:45:08|
|Subject: Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles|