Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords dynamically from PostgreSQL headers
Date: 2011-01-09 14:41:46
Message-ID: AANLkTi=J4Jfyu6NBE2=uZH8vjGnTMLjx8z98rby9sr7W@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Clearly someone quite useless...

I've applied a patch to the postgresql build system to install gram.h - feel
free to give it a whirl to make sure it comes through all the way into the
installer.

//Magnus

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 19:24, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> The installer bundles everything that is copied into the installation
> staging directory by the VC++ build scripts. If that file is missing, then
> Postgres' build system most likely didn't copy it into our staging area. I
> wonder who wrote that? :-p
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>wrote:
>
>> Hmm. If it's included in he linux installer but not the windows one, that
>> looks like a bug in the windows installer to me. Is it an optoinal feature
>> that can be turned on and off, or is it supposed to always be installed?
>> (question directed at the installer guys, not you Jasmin! :P)
>>
>> //Magnus
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 18:19, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
>> jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>> Date: 2011/1/6
>>> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Pull keywords
>>> dynamically from PostgreSQL headers
>>> To: Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, I've noticed now, that the file is only included in the linux
>>> binaries version. Maybe the pgadmin3/INSTALL File should be modified to make
>>> this clear - for beginners.
>>>
>>> I had downloaded the windows version before.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>>
>>>> I just downloaded one to cross check.
>>>> And as I suspect, they include those headers.
>>>>
>>>> Please download it again (if possible).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
>>>> jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgbindownload.do two weeks
>>>>> ago.
>>>>>  <http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pgbindownload.do>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From where did you get it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
>>>>>> jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> unpacked zip. version is 8.4
>>>>>>> should i build it from source?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how did you install it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
>>>>>>>> jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the directory is there, but no gram.h.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have %PGDIR%/include/postgresql/server/parser directory
>>>>>>>>>> which contains gram.h?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
>>>>>>>>>> jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> since this patch is applied, i can't build
>>>>>>>>>>> pgAdmin. %pgdir%\include\server\parser doesn't contain a gram.h file.
>>>>>>>>>>> What I'm doing wrong?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ty
>>>>>>>>>>> Jasmin
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2011/1/5 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 06:05, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Magnus Hagander <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 18:46, Ashesh Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Magnus/Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This check-in has added one compilation error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The following line introduce an error in file '*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pgadmin/db/keywords.c*'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *#include <server/parser/gram.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <server/parser/kwlist.h>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because - these header files does not always find under *`pg_config
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --includedir`* folder, but can be found under *`pg_config
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --pkgincludedir`*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the patch to resolve the issue. This applies on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both master and REL-1_12_PATCHES branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks good in general, but do we actually need to put it on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.12? The keyword build changes were only applied to master, so unless we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually *need* it on the back branch, I don't think we should put it there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Is it needed for something else as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch should only be applied on master.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Thanks, confirmed and applied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-01-09 17:09:15
Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Don't include the parser codes in the keyword list
Previous:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-01-07 18:28:21
Subject: Re: Debug works, Release not

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group