Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de
Cc: daniel alvarez <d-alvarez(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Still a bug in the VACUUM ??? !!!
Date: 2003-02-17 18:56:20
Message-ID: 9919.1045508180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

Andreas Schmitz <a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de> writes:
> I think it is not the same. When I ran the vaccum when no other clients whe=
> re=20
> connected to the database.

The vacuum that reports the NOTICEs is not the one that created the
problem. The scenario I was talking about requires concurrent clients
during the preceding vacuum.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martins Zarins 2003-02-17 19:03:27 FATAL 2: open of /usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0943 failed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-17 18:54:33 Re: md5 authentication fails

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-17 19:00:26 Re: Hard problem with concurrency
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-02-17 18:51:16 Re: location of the configuration files