Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Date: 2011-09-08 01:02:04
Message-ID: 9886.1315443724@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:39:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW ... what were the last versions you were running on which you had
>> *not* seen the problem?  (Just wondering about the possibility that we
>> back-patched some "fix" that broke things.  It would be good to have
>> a version range before trawling the commit logs.)

> The first version we saw it on was 8.4.7.

Yeah, you said that.  I was wondering what you'd last run before 8.4.7.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-08 01:22:40
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held
Previous:From: davegDate: 2011-09-08 00:55:59
Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group